<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL and Oracle: not so straight forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonyscott.org.uk/2009/12/15/mysql-and-oracle-not-so-straight-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonyscott.org.uk/2009/12/15/mysql-and-oracle-not-so-straight-forward/</link>
	<description>Tony Scott - Web designer/developer, specialising in WordPress, and television vision controller based in London UK.  The web &#38; broadcasting blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Scott</title>
		<link>http://tonyscott.org.uk/2009/12/15/mysql-and-oracle-not-so-straight-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-16235</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyscott.org.uk/?p=628#comment-16235</guid>
		<description>Agreed about Oracle. 

The fork option is there if required, although it would be better if dedicated full time developers continued to work on MySQL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about Oracle. </p>
<p>The fork option is there if required, although it would be better if dedicated full time developers continued to work on MySQL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Coveney</title>
		<link>http://tonyscott.org.uk/2009/12/15/mysql-and-oracle-not-so-straight-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-16232</link>
		<dc:creator>David Coveney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyscott.org.uk/?p=628#comment-16232</guid>
		<description>My biggest worry with Oracle taking /anything/ over is that they&#039;re notorious for damaging a business they take over.  PeopleSoft was never the same after Oracle took control - it could be the same for mySQL, which would be a crying shame - it&#039;s a very powerful and useful database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest worry with Oracle taking /anything/ over is that they&#8217;re notorious for damaging a business they take over.  PeopleSoft was never the same after Oracle took control &#8211; it could be the same for mySQL, which would be a crying shame &#8211; it&#8217;s a very powerful and useful database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

